People had been seeking simpler ways to perform calculations for centuries. Engineers, until the 1960s, used slide rules, a hand-operated mechanical calculator. It is one of the simplest analog computers which could perform multiplication, division, square roots, trigonometry, and some other functions, but it is accurate to only three digits. Also, the answers came without giving the location of the decimal point, so general knowledge of the answer was needed.

When you hear the word technology, you probably think of computers or tablets. Do you think of calculators as technology?

Calculators have become an essential electronic tool for performing more complicated arithmetic.

**Basic Calculators**

The first electronic hand-held calculators needed to be plugged in and could only perform the basic four arithmetic operations: addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

Initially, adults were reluctant to allow children to get their hands on calculators. They feared the students would not learn their facts and become so dependent on the devices they would never develop the ability to perform mental math.

As virtually everything in life, calculators provide positives and negatives, advantages and disadvantages.

One real advantage is that story problems can use realistic numbers, not dumbed-down simple numbers that are easy to compute. Emphasis can properly be directed toward the problem at hand, rather than being limited by the arithmetic.

Another advantage is that students no longer need to learn to find square roots with paper and pencil or spend hours mastering the intricacies of multi-digit long division.

On the other hand, to prevent nonsensical results, the calculator users must learn to estimate the solution before punching the buttons. Following a division, they need to know what to do with any remainder. They need to master built-in features of a constant key and memory functions.

A mathematically proficient student has learned when to perform a calculation mentally and when to use a calculator.

Research shows students who use calculators **appropriately** do the best in mathematics.

**Scientific Calculators**

Basic calculators gradually evolved by incorporating more and more features. So-called scientific calculators include pi, as well as trigonometric, exponential, and statistical functions. It also does fractions in traditional fraction form; 1/4. Scientific calculator screens display not only the current number, but the entire expression.

A free online version can be found at desmos.com/scientific. Much can be gained by simply experimenting with a calculator using intuition and creativity. Anyone who can use all the buttons correctly on one of these devices is doing college-level math.

Besides the advanced mathematical operations, scientific calculators perform simple arithmetic differently in two significant ways.

The first difference is the **order of operations**. In a basic calculator, keying in 2 + 3 × 4 will give 20; the scientific calculator will give 14. Why the difference?

While the basic calculator is adding 2 + 3 before multiplying by 4, the scientific calculator multiplies 3 × 4 before adding 2. The scientific calculator gives the mathematically correct answer since multiplication is to be performed before addition or subtraction, according to the order of operations.

The second difference is the way the calculators **store the results** of an operation. The basic calculator truncates, or chops off, an answer while the scientific calculator stores the actual result.

For example, adding (1 ÷ 3) and (2 ÷ 3) on the basic calculator gives the answer 0.9999999 because it stores 1 ÷ 3 as 0.3333333 and 2 ÷ 3 as 0.6666666. The scientific calculator uses the actual values, which, when added together, gives the correct answer of 1.

It’s helpful to know that both the SAT and the ACT assessment exams allow the use of a calculator. They have a list of acceptable calculators and suggest the test taker be thoroughly familiar with the use of the chosen calculator.

**Computers**

When personal computers became available, they were accepted more enthusiastically than calculators were. Computers were often used for teaching elementary programming and keyboarding skills.

There still exists the “month myth,” the totally untrue notion that a person can learn everything they need to know to be computer literate in a month. This myth may have been true 40 years ago, but today it takes years to master finding information and navigating all the basic programs available on computers. Many state high school math standards suggest students learn computer algebra systems and dynamic geometry software.

Sometimes to practice keyboarding skills, students were instructed to write a paragraph and then type it into the computer. Unfortunately, that practice diminishes learning to compose at the keyboard, an essential skill in today’s world for students and workers.

Writers also need to learn how to edit their work at the computer. Regrettably, many language arts state standards do not address teaching students the art of using the computer for composing and editing. Recent research shows, on the other hand, that note taking is often best done with paper and pencil.

**Learning Math with a Computer**

Beginning in the late 1970s, programmers were producing computer software that promoted learning facts through “drill and kill.” Studies show such gains made usually disappear after about a year. There are several difficulties with this approach:

- What is learned by rote needs frequent review.
- A child often is not given a way to find the correct answer.
- The learning is frequently interrupted to provide a “reward,” breaking the child’s concentration.
- Deep learning is not fostered by extrinsic rewards.
- Ordinarily, children learn better when they can physically handle a manipulative.
- The child may be constrained to write the number from right to left, even though left to right may be more intuitive.

More recently, complete math programs are available on electronic devices. While these may work for older students, especially if they teach for understanding, they have not been proven successful for younger children.

The younger student needs human interaction with careful guidance, encouragement, and assessment.

This is what RightStart Math is all about.

john oberman says

well stated and very true about programs on the computer